https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192063 Section 10-A of the Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act was treated as a protective provision for surplus land, and it prevailed where a tenant-purchase order under section 18 would otherwise reduce the surplus pool. A compromise-based purchase order without a real enquiry into statutory eligibility was not binding on the State for surplus-area purposes and could be ignored as ineffective. Surplus area also had to be determined with reference to the relevant statutory date; land already in the tenancy of another tenant within that tenant's permissible area could not later be added to the landowner's surplus area merely because the tenant changed. en-us Mon, 21 Jan 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 May 2017 15:08:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192063 Section 10-A of the Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act was treated as a protective provision for surplus land, and it prevailed where a tenant-purchase order under section 18 would otherwise reduce the surplus pool. A compromise-based purchase order without a real enquiry into statutory eligibility was not binding on the State for surplus-area purposes and could be ignored as ineffective. Surplus area also had to be determined with reference to the relevant statutory date; land already in the tenancy of another tenant within that tenant's permissible area could not later be added to the landowner's surplus area merely because the tenant changed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 21 Jan 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192063