<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (2) TMI 34 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7786</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, dismissing the petition challenging it. The court rejected claims of mala fide intention behind the notice issuance and clarified the requirements for recording reasons under section 148(2). Additionally, the court addressed the limitation issue under section 149(1)(b), stating it should be raised before the Income-tax Officer rather than in writ proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (2) TMI 34 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7786</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, dismissing the petition challenging it. The court rejected claims of mala fide intention behind the notice issuance and clarified the requirements for recording reasons under section 148(2). Additionally, the court addressed the limitation issue under section 149(1)(b), stating it should be raised before the Income-tax Officer rather than in writ proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>