<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (12) TMI 18 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7785</link>
    <description>The court upheld the jurisdiction of the Income-tax Officer to issue a notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, finding that there were reasonable grounds and a rational connection between the information gathered and the belief that income had escaped assessment. The challenge to the notice based on lack of jurisdiction and arbitrary belief was dismissed, leading to the discharge of the rule and vacation of all interim orders, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (12) TMI 18 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7785</link>
      <description>The court upheld the jurisdiction of the Income-tax Officer to issue a notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, finding that there were reasonable grounds and a rational connection between the information gathered and the belief that income had escaped assessment. The challenge to the notice based on lack of jurisdiction and arbitrary belief was dismissed, leading to the discharge of the rule and vacation of all interim orders, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>