<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (10) TMI 152 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192060</link>
    <description>Benami ownership is determined chiefly by the source of consideration and by who actually enjoyed the property, with admissions and surrounding documentary evidence carrying substantive weight. Where the purchaser cannot credibly prove that he supplied the purchase money or exercised ownership, the apparent holder may be treated as only the ostensible owner and the real provider of funds as beneficial owner. A later transfer will also be treated as sham where the surrounding facts show a hurried arrangement, existing liability, prior attachment efforts, and control by persons seeking to place the asset beyond creditors&#039; reach.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 12:15:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (10) TMI 152 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192060</link>
      <description>Benami ownership is determined chiefly by the source of consideration and by who actually enjoyed the property, with admissions and surrounding documentary evidence carrying substantive weight. Where the purchaser cannot credibly prove that he supplied the purchase money or exercised ownership, the apparent holder may be treated as only the ostensible owner and the real provider of funds as beneficial owner. A later transfer will also be treated as sham where the surrounding facts show a hurried arrangement, existing liability, prior attachment efforts, and control by persons seeking to place the asset beyond creditors&#039; reach.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>