<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (6) TMI 11 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7774</link>
    <description>Professional fees paid to tax consultants for handling income-tax assessment and appellate proceedings were treated as deductible business expenditure under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The governing test was whether the outlay was laid out wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the business, and the court accepted that fees incurred to secure a correct assessment and protect business funds were commercially expedient. The distinction between tax as such and expenditure incurred to ascertain the correct tax liability was material: the latter was regarded as a business outgoing because it preserved legitimate profits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (6) TMI 11 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7774</link>
      <description>Professional fees paid to tax consultants for handling income-tax assessment and appellate proceedings were treated as deductible business expenditure under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The governing test was whether the outlay was laid out wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the business, and the court accepted that fees incurred to secure a correct assessment and protect business funds were commercially expedient. The distinction between tax as such and expenditure incurred to ascertain the correct tax liability was material: the latter was regarded as a business outgoing because it preserved legitimate profits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>