<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 1120 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192047</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessment order under sections 143(3) and 153A was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest. The CIT&#039;s revision under section 263, disallowing additional depreciation on a windmill, was deemed unjustified as the issue was not based on seized material. The Tribunal quashed the CIT&#039;s order and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that the assessment order was in line with the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 09:37:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 1120 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192047</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessment order under sections 143(3) and 153A was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest. The CIT&#039;s revision under section 263, disallowing additional depreciation on a windmill, was deemed unjustified as the issue was not based on seized material. The Tribunal quashed the CIT&#039;s order and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that the assessment order was in line with the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>