https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192051 The Bombay HC framed substantial questions of law on whether a sub-contractor remained liable to service tax despite payment by the main contractor, whether departmental circulars applicable to the relevant period could extend relief, whether the show cause notice could validly invoke the extended period under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994, and whether penalties under Sections 76, 77 and 78 were sustainable. The appeals were admitted on these questions of law. en-us Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 May 2017 09:37:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192051 The Bombay HC framed substantial questions of law on whether a sub-contractor remained liable to service tax despite payment by the main contractor, whether departmental circulars applicable to the relevant period could extend relief, whether the show cause notice could validly invoke the extended period under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994, and whether penalties under Sections 76, 77 and 78 were sustainable. The appeals were admitted on these questions of law. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192051