<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (10) TMI 15 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7768</link>
    <description>Where appellate regulations expressly permit additional evidence, the Tribunal may admit evidence relating to a subsequent event in an agricultural income-tax appeal. The Kerala Agricultural Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Regulations, 1965, regulation 25(1)(b), was treated as an enabling provision supporting that jurisdiction. The Tribunal&#039;s consideration of the later event was therefore proper, and the question was answered in favour of the assessee and against the department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (10) TMI 15 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7768</link>
      <description>Where appellate regulations expressly permit additional evidence, the Tribunal may admit evidence relating to a subsequent event in an agricultural income-tax appeal. The Kerala Agricultural Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Regulations, 1965, regulation 25(1)(b), was treated as an enabling provision supporting that jurisdiction. The Tribunal&#039;s consideration of the later event was therefore proper, and the question was answered in favour of the assessee and against the department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>