<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 520 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342782</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of with the penalty under Section 76 being waived based on the reasonable cause shown by the appellant for the delay in service tax payment. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting the benefit of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to the delay being attributed to the head office&#039;s fund release delay and not intentional non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 07:13:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 520 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342782</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of with the penalty under Section 76 being waived based on the reasonable cause shown by the appellant for the delay in service tax payment. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting the benefit of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to the delay being attributed to the head office&#039;s fund release delay and not intentional non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>