<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 517 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342779</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal against the order of confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant&#039;s deposit of duty before the issuance of the show cause notice was deemed irrelevant to the adjudication proceedings under Section 33 of the Act. The Court held that the deposit did not impact the completed adjudication process, ruling in favor of the revenue and against the appellant. As a result, the appeal was dismissed based on this legal interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 517 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342779</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal against the order of confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant&#039;s deposit of duty before the issuance of the show cause notice was deemed irrelevant to the adjudication proceedings under Section 33 of the Act. The Court held that the deposit did not impact the completed adjudication process, ruling in favor of the revenue and against the appellant. As a result, the appeal was dismissed based on this legal interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>