<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 511 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342773</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-C.E. applied only where the specified parts were consumed within the factory of production for manufacture of the exempt goods. Conveyor belt systems cleared to other units did not meet the captive consumption condition, so the plain wording of the notification could not be ignored or expanded. The exemption was therefore unavailable, and the demand was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 07:13:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 511 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342773</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-C.E. applied only where the specified parts were consumed within the factory of production for manufacture of the exempt goods. Conveyor belt systems cleared to other units did not meet the captive consumption condition, so the plain wording of the notification could not be ignored or expanded. The exemption was therefore unavailable, and the demand was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>