<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 497 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342759</link>
    <description>The court upheld the absolute confiscation of 54 gold bars seized under the Customs Act, 1962, due to clear evidence of smuggling by the main individual. Penalties imposed on the main individual were deemed appropriate. However, penalties on other appellants were overturned as insufficient evidence linked them to the smuggling. The main individual&#039;s appeal was dismissed, while the appeals of the other two appellants were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 14:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 497 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342759</link>
      <description>The court upheld the absolute confiscation of 54 gold bars seized under the Customs Act, 1962, due to clear evidence of smuggling by the main individual. Penalties imposed on the main individual were deemed appropriate. However, penalties on other appellants were overturned as insufficient evidence linked them to the smuggling. The main individual&#039;s appeal was dismissed, while the appeals of the other two appellants were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>