<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 485 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342747</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeals, upholding the decisions of the CIT(A) and ITAT. It affirmed that demurrage and wharfage charges were deductible under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, provisions for post-retirement benefits were valid and not subject to Section 43B, and interest accrued on an advance was not taxable as no &#039;real income&#039; was received. The judgment emphasized adherence to legal principles and past precedents in resolving the issues raised by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 07:10:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 485 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342747</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeals, upholding the decisions of the CIT(A) and ITAT. It affirmed that demurrage and wharfage charges were deductible under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, provisions for post-retirement benefits were valid and not subject to Section 43B, and interest accrued on an advance was not taxable as no &#039;real income&#039; was received. The judgment emphasized adherence to legal principles and past precedents in resolving the issues raised by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>