<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (5) TMI 9 - ASSAM AND NAGALAND High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7763</link>
    <description>Cancellation of firm registration was invalid where the assessee was not given a reasonable opportunity to meet undisclosed materials and the notice was effectively peremptory; those cancellation orders were set aside and remitted for fresh consideration. For the earlier year, registration could not be cancelled after an appellate order had already directed that it be granted, so that cancellation was quashed. Reopening notices were also without jurisdiction because the recorded reasons did not show a failure to disclose primary facts, and section 147(a) could not be invoked to bypass the limits applicable to reopening on later information.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (5) TMI 9 - ASSAM AND NAGALAND High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7763</link>
      <description>Cancellation of firm registration was invalid where the assessee was not given a reasonable opportunity to meet undisclosed materials and the notice was effectively peremptory; those cancellation orders were set aside and remitted for fresh consideration. For the earlier year, registration could not be cancelled after an appellate order had already directed that it be granted, so that cancellation was quashed. Reopening notices were also without jurisdiction because the recorded reasons did not show a failure to disclose primary facts, and section 147(a) could not be invoked to bypass the limits applicable to reopening on later information.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>