<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 481 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342743</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the assessee was not required to deduct tax at source on bank guarantee commission under section 194H of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT relied on a previous decision in the assessee&#039;s favor for A.Y. 2011-12, establishing that no TDS was payable on such charges. The Revenue&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2012-13 was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 481 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342743</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the assessee was not required to deduct tax at source on bank guarantee commission under section 194H of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT relied on a previous decision in the assessee&#039;s favor for A.Y. 2011-12, establishing that no TDS was payable on such charges. The Revenue&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2012-13 was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>