<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 472 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342734</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on the nature of expenditure for renovation, valuation of closing stock, and disallowance of business loss and under section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the renovation expenditure was revenue in nature, upheld the tax-neutral valuation method for closing stock, and partially allowed the Assessee&#039;s Cross Objection regarding the disallowance under section 14A, limiting it to dividend income earned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 07:09:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 472 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342734</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on the nature of expenditure for renovation, valuation of closing stock, and disallowance of business loss and under section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the renovation expenditure was revenue in nature, upheld the tax-neutral valuation method for closing stock, and partially allowed the Assessee&#039;s Cross Objection regarding the disallowance under section 14A, limiting it to dividend income earned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>