<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Some vital aspects not contended at all or not emphasized on behalf of Godrej Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd resulting into ruling that section 14A applies to exempted dividend though taxed u/s 115O. A fit case for review and reconsideration</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7407</link>
    <description>The article contends that section 14A disallowance should not apply to dividends taxed at distribution under separate provisions because such dividends form part of the &quot;total income under this Act,&quot; and section 14A targets expenditure in relation to income that &quot;does not form part of the total income under this Act.&quot; It further argues the legislative purpose of section 14A and the nature of holding-related expenses distinguish taxed-at-source dividends from wholly exempt incomes, and that these points were not adequately advanced in the reported litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 07:03:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 07:03:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Some vital aspects not contended at all or not emphasized on behalf of Godrej Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd resulting into ruling that section 14A applies to exempted dividend though taxed u/s 115O. A fit case for review and reconsideration</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7407</link>
      <description>The article contends that section 14A disallowance should not apply to dividends taxed at distribution under separate provisions because such dividends form part of the &quot;total income under this Act,&quot; and section 14A targets expenditure in relation to income that &quot;does not form part of the total income under this Act.&quot; It further argues the legislative purpose of section 14A and the nature of holding-related expenses distinguish taxed-at-source dividends from wholly exempt incomes, and that these points were not adequately advanced in the reported litigation.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 07:03:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>