<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (1) TMI 241 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192037</link>
    <description>A later prosecution is not barred where fresh material reveals a distinct or wider conspiracy than the one already under consideration in an earlier case. Identity of some facts or property does not make two conspiracies the same in substance if the later case involves additional persons, a different object, and different offences. The police may also continue further investigation after an earlier charge-sheet and after cognizance has been taken when new facts emerge, and may submit a further report based on that material. The Magistrate remains in control of the next procedural step, and the absence of mala fides or abuse supports the validity of the course adopted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 17:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (1) TMI 241 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192037</link>
      <description>A later prosecution is not barred where fresh material reveals a distinct or wider conspiracy than the one already under consideration in an earlier case. Identity of some facts or property does not make two conspiracies the same in substance if the later case involves additional persons, a different object, and different offences. The police may also continue further investigation after an earlier charge-sheet and after cognizance has been taken when new facts emerge, and may submit a further report based on that material. The Magistrate remains in control of the next procedural step, and the absence of mala fides or abuse supports the validity of the course adopted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>