<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 467 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342729</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the amounts received by the appellant under the technical assistance agreements could not be subjected to service tax under the category of IPR service. It found no merit in the impugned order and set it aside, allowing the appeal. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced in open court on 05/05/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 467 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342729</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the amounts received by the appellant under the technical assistance agreements could not be subjected to service tax under the category of IPR service. It found no merit in the impugned order and set it aside, allowing the appeal. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced in open court on 05/05/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>