<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 463 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342725</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that services provided by the appellant were not liable to service tax under &#039;Club or Association Services&#039;. Citing a precedent, it determined that services to members were not taxable due to the principle of mutuality. Since services to non-members were outside the scope of &#039;Club or Association Services&#039;, the impugned order was deemed unsustainable. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the original order, with the decision issued on 07/04/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 16:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 463 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342725</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that services provided by the appellant were not liable to service tax under &#039;Club or Association Services&#039;. Citing a precedent, it determined that services to members were not taxable due to the principle of mutuality. Since services to non-members were outside the scope of &#039;Club or Association Services&#039;, the impugned order was deemed unsustainable. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the original order, with the decision issued on 07/04/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>