<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 460 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342722</link>
    <description>In depot sales, valuation under Section 4 and the valuation rules was based on the normal transaction value at which the greatest aggregate quantity was sold, so the 18.5% trade discount for stockist and sub-stockist clearances was allowable. Turnover discount was deductible only to the extent actually passed on to buyers, and the matter was remanded for verification of the supporting records on actual basis. On finalization of provisional assessment, adjustment of refund against demand was held permissible under the relevant rule, so that objection was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 May 2017 07:26:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 460 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342722</link>
      <description>In depot sales, valuation under Section 4 and the valuation rules was based on the normal transaction value at which the greatest aggregate quantity was sold, so the 18.5% trade discount for stockist and sub-stockist clearances was allowable. Turnover discount was deductible only to the extent actually passed on to buyers, and the matter was remanded for verification of the supporting records on actual basis. On finalization of provisional assessment, adjustment of refund against demand was held permissible under the relevant rule, so that objection was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>