https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342716 The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee-Appellants, overturning the Order-in-Original issued by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur. The dispute centered on the clearance of Coarse Ore without duty payment and the demand of duty under Rule 6(3A) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal found no legal basis for charging interest for delayed credit reversal, citing compliance with Rule 6 requirements. The decision was influenced by the interpretation of Rule 6(3) and comparison with similar cases, leading to the appeal's success and resolution of the issues raised. en-us Thu, 30 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 May 2017 07:26:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342716 The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee-Appellants, overturning the Order-in-Original issued by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur. The dispute centered on the clearance of Coarse Ore without duty payment and the demand of duty under Rule 6(3A) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal found no legal basis for charging interest for delayed credit reversal, citing compliance with Rule 6 requirements. The decision was influenced by the interpretation of Rule 6(3) and comparison with similar cases, leading to the appeal's success and resolution of the issues raised. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 30 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342716