https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342700 Pendency of criminal proceedings did not bar a disciplinary inquiry under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, because the two proceedings were distinct. The High Court found that the respondent had been repeatedly given s to participate and defend himself, but had sought adjournments and avoided the inquiry. On the documentary and oral evidence, including vouchers, challans and written sheets, the finding of other misconduct was supported and neither unfairness nor perversity in the inquiry process was shown. The disciplinary finding was affirmed, and the respondent was directed to be removed from membership for five years. en-us Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 May 2017 07:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342700 Pendency of criminal proceedings did not bar a disciplinary inquiry under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, because the two proceedings were distinct. The High Court found that the respondent had been repeatedly given s to participate and defend himself, but had sought adjournments and avoided the inquiry. On the documentary and oral evidence, including vouchers, challans and written sheets, the finding of other misconduct was supported and neither unfairness nor perversity in the inquiry process was shown. The disciplinary finding was affirmed, and the respondent was directed to be removed from membership for five years. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342700