<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 437 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342699</link>
    <description>The court held that a compromise decree is capable of execution once accepted, and the executing court can assess reciprocal performance. The issue of stamping settlement terms under the Indian Stamp Act was not a primary concern. The court focused on parties&#039; performance under the compromise decree, finding the decree holder fulfilled obligations, allowing the execution to proceed despite objections. The court dismissed the application, determining the decree holder&#039;s performance rendered the decree executable, rejecting petitioner&#039;s contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 May 2017 07:24:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 437 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342699</link>
      <description>The court held that a compromise decree is capable of execution once accepted, and the executing court can assess reciprocal performance. The issue of stamping settlement terms under the Indian Stamp Act was not a primary concern. The court focused on parties&#039; performance under the compromise decree, finding the decree holder fulfilled obligations, allowing the execution to proceed despite objections. The court dismissed the application, determining the decree holder&#039;s performance rendered the decree executable, rejecting petitioner&#039;s contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>