<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 436 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342698</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the High Court has the inherent jurisdiction to condone delays in filing appeals under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, despite the subsequent insertion of sub-section (2A) granting explicit authority. The Court therefore condoned a fourteen-day delay in filing the appeal and directed the High Court to proceed with the appeal on its merits. The civil appeal was disposed of, and any pending applications were resolved accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 May 2017 07:24:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 436 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342698</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the High Court has the inherent jurisdiction to condone delays in filing appeals under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, despite the subsequent insertion of sub-section (2A) granting explicit authority. The Court therefore condoned a fourteen-day delay in filing the appeal and directed the High Court to proceed with the appeal on its merits. The civil appeal was disposed of, and any pending applications were resolved accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>