<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 434 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342696</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court precedent established that the appointed date mentioned in the scheme is crucial, and the scheme becomes effective from that date, irrespective of the court&#039;s sanctioning date or filing with the Registrar of Companies. In this case, the High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, confirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the effective date of amalgamation and the non-liability of the dissolved company for assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2017 11:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 434 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342696</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court precedent established that the appointed date mentioned in the scheme is crucial, and the scheme becomes effective from that date, irrespective of the court&#039;s sanctioning date or filing with the Registrar of Companies. In this case, the High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, confirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the effective date of amalgamation and the non-liability of the dissolved company for assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>