<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 422 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342684</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the orders of the AO and CIT(A). It restored the original assessment, concluding that the reopening of the assessment was invalid and that the business had commenced during the relevant assessment year. The tribunal did not need to adjudicate the alternative grounds separately due to the primary grounds being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 422 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342684</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the orders of the AO and CIT(A). It restored the original assessment, concluding that the reopening of the assessment was invalid and that the business had commenced during the relevant assessment year. The tribunal did not need to adjudicate the alternative grounds separately due to the primary grounds being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>