<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 418 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342680</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition under Section 68 and the adjustment in the value of closing stock under Section 145A. However, the issue of disallowance of interest under Section 36(1)(iii) was remanded to the AO for further examination as the necessary documentation was not provided by the assessee. The appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed, with the tribunal&#039;s order pronounced on 4th May 2017 at Ahmedabad.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 May 2017 07:23:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 418 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342680</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition under Section 68 and the adjustment in the value of closing stock under Section 145A. However, the issue of disallowance of interest under Section 36(1)(iii) was remanded to the AO for further examination as the necessary documentation was not provided by the assessee. The appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed, with the tribunal&#039;s order pronounced on 4th May 2017 at Ahmedabad.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>