<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 417 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342679</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on the disallowance of wages under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the laborers were employees of the assessee, not contractors, exempting the assessee from TDS deduction requirements under section 194C. The Tribunal dismissed the technical issue regarding the validity of re-assessment proceedings as the primary issue was decided in favor of the appellant. The judgment clarified the distinction between employees and contractors, emphasizing the employer-employee relationship in determining TDS obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 May 2017 07:23:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 417 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342679</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on the disallowance of wages under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the laborers were employees of the assessee, not contractors, exempting the assessee from TDS deduction requirements under section 194C. The Tribunal dismissed the technical issue regarding the validity of re-assessment proceedings as the primary issue was decided in favor of the appellant. The judgment clarified the distinction between employees and contractors, emphasizing the employer-employee relationship in determining TDS obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>