<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 416 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342678</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the assessment/reassessment order due to lack of jurisdiction in reopening the assessment and non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements under the Income Tax Act. The reassessment was deemed invalid as the Assessing Officer failed to independently satisfy the conditions for reopening beyond four years and did not address the objections raised by the assessee before finalizing the reassessment. The decision was based on legal precedents emphasizing the importance of proper jurisdiction and procedural compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 10:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 416 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342678</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the assessment/reassessment order due to lack of jurisdiction in reopening the assessment and non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements under the Income Tax Act. The reassessment was deemed invalid as the Assessing Officer failed to independently satisfy the conditions for reopening beyond four years and did not address the objections raised by the assessee before finalizing the reassessment. The decision was based on legal precedents emphasizing the importance of proper jurisdiction and procedural compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>