<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1279 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192023</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source on guarantee commission payments to the bank under section 194H of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on the precedent set by a previous case, M/s. Kotak Securities Ltd., which established that there was no requirement for TDS deduction in such circumstances. Consequently, the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 20:26:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1279 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192023</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source on guarantee commission payments to the bank under section 194H of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on the precedent set by a previous case, M/s. Kotak Securities Ltd., which established that there was no requirement for TDS deduction in such circumstances. Consequently, the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>