<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 755 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192017</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by directing the Assessing Officer to estimate net profit at 5% of purchases or stock put for sale, ensuring assessed income is not less than the returned income. The Tribunal upheld the addition of unexplained cash credits under section 68 due to lack of proof of source, dismissing the appeal on this ground. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the reduction of depreciation claim on a car by 1/4th for potential personal use, dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal on this issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 16:49:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 755 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192017</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by directing the Assessing Officer to estimate net profit at 5% of purchases or stock put for sale, ensuring assessed income is not less than the returned income. The Tribunal upheld the addition of unexplained cash credits under section 68 due to lack of proof of source, dismissing the appeal on this ground. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the reduction of depreciation claim on a car by 1/4th for potential personal use, dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal on this issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>