https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192011 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete additions made by the AO on account of undervaluation of closing stock, telephone and car expenses, traveling, generator, packing expenses, and advertisement expenses. The Tribunal found that the AO's additions lacked factual basis and proper evidence, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal on all grounds. en-us Thu, 30 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 May 2017 15:27:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192011 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete additions made by the AO on account of undervaluation of closing stock, telephone and car expenses, traveling, generator, packing expenses, and advertisement expenses. The Tribunal found that the AO's additions lacked factual basis and proper evidence, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal on all grounds. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 30 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192011