<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 397 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342659</link>
    <description>Port-related construction and earthwork services were held to fall within the applicable service tax exemptions for construction in relation to ports and for site formation, excavation and earthmoving activities, so the demand failed to that extent. The balance demands were sent back for de novo adjudication because the classification objections, abatement claim and related pleas had not been properly examined, and the factual and legal character of the services required fresh consideration. The appeal therefore succeeded partly on merits, with the remaining issues remanded for reconsideration after giving opportunity and permitting additional evidence as allowed by law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 07:43:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 397 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342659</link>
      <description>Port-related construction and earthwork services were held to fall within the applicable service tax exemptions for construction in relation to ports and for site formation, excavation and earthmoving activities, so the demand failed to that extent. The balance demands were sent back for de novo adjudication because the classification objections, abatement claim and related pleas had not been properly examined, and the factual and legal character of the services required fresh consideration. The appeal therefore succeeded partly on merits, with the remaining issues remanded for reconsideration after giving opportunity and permitting additional evidence as allowed by law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>