<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 394 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342656</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-CE was confined to parts consumed within the factory of production for manufacture of the specified goods, and an exemption notification had to be applied strictly according to its terms. Because the parts were cleared to other units and were not shown to have been captively consumed in the appellant&#039;s factory, the statutory condition was not satisfied. The exemption was therefore unavailable, and the demand was sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 394 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342656</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-CE was confined to parts consumed within the factory of production for manufacture of the specified goods, and an exemption notification had to be applied strictly according to its terms. Because the parts were cleared to other units and were not shown to have been captively consumed in the appellant&#039;s factory, the statutory condition was not satisfied. The exemption was therefore unavailable, and the demand was sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>