https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342655 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner's rejection of the remission claim for goods destroyed in a fire incident at the appellant's factory. The Tribunal found that the loss was due to an unavoidable accident caused by an electric short-circuit, and the appellant had cooperated with investigations. Emphasizing the need for objective analysis, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant's entitlement to remission under Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules, granting consequential benefits and highlighting the importance of judicial satisfaction in evaluating such claims. en-us Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 May 2017 07:42:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342655 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner's rejection of the remission claim for goods destroyed in a fire incident at the appellant's factory. The Tribunal found that the loss was due to an unavoidable accident caused by an electric short-circuit, and the appellant had cooperated with investigations. Emphasizing the need for objective analysis, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant's entitlement to remission under Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules, granting consequential benefits and highlighting the importance of judicial satisfaction in evaluating such claims. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342655