<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 390 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342652</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing them to claim CENVAT Credit for services received at non-registered locations, as these services were deemed integral to projects managed by their registered office. The decision emphasized adherence to established precedents and consistency in legal interpretations, setting aside the impugned order and dismissing the miscellaneous application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 14:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 390 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342652</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing them to claim CENVAT Credit for services received at non-registered locations, as these services were deemed integral to projects managed by their registered office. The decision emphasized adherence to established precedents and consistency in legal interpretations, setting aside the impugned order and dismissing the miscellaneous application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>