https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342651 The Tribunal allowed the rectification application for the appellant's case due to an oversight in the final order. In the matter of denial of Cenvat Credit, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, highlighting the lack of substantial investigation and cross-examination of the registered dealer. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellants. The judgment emphasized the importance of thorough investigation and due process in cases involving the denial of credits. en-us Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 May 2017 07:42:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342651 The Tribunal allowed the rectification application for the appellant's case due to an oversight in the final order. In the matter of denial of Cenvat Credit, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, highlighting the lack of substantial investigation and cross-examination of the registered dealer. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellants. The judgment emphasized the importance of thorough investigation and due process in cases involving the denial of credits. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342651