<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 376 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342638</link>
    <description>Where the sales tax statute contains express entries classifying tooth paste and tooth powder as toilet articles and face cream as cosmetics, those specific classifications prevail over trade meaning, and a separate entry for drugs and medicines cannot be used to reclassify them. A prior Division Bench view treating the products as medicines was held per incuriam because it ignored the relevant statutory scheme and could not bind the Court. Classification under excise law could not be imported into the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, since each enactment must be construed on its own language. The earlier order was set aside and the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 12:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 376 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342638</link>
      <description>Where the sales tax statute contains express entries classifying tooth paste and tooth powder as toilet articles and face cream as cosmetics, those specific classifications prevail over trade meaning, and a separate entry for drugs and medicines cannot be used to reclassify them. A prior Division Bench view treating the products as medicines was held per incuriam because it ignored the relevant statutory scheme and could not bind the Court. Classification under excise law could not be imported into the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, since each enactment must be construed on its own language. The earlier order was set aside and the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>