<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 365 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342627</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowed cash payments made for the purchase of land under section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the land was initially acquired as an investment and later converted into stock in trade, making it exempt from the provisions of section 40A(3) regarding cash payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 07:40:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 365 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342627</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowed cash payments made for the purchase of land under section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the land was initially acquired as an investment and later converted into stock in trade, making it exempt from the provisions of section 40A(3) regarding cash payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>