<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 911 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191989</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to estimate the net profit at 5% of total purchases and verify the availability of deemed income from the preceding year for granting telescoping benefits. The additions towards unexplained capital and unsecured loans were upheld due to insufficient evidence provided by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 17:36:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 911 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191989</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to estimate the net profit at 5% of total purchases and verify the availability of deemed income from the preceding year for granting telescoping benefits. The additions towards unexplained capital and unsecured loans were upheld due to insufficient evidence provided by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>