<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1207 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191986</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2005-06. The Tribunal upheld the denial of the claim for deduction based on legal principles, following the decision in the case of Reliance Petro Products. The penalty was not imposed due to the denial of the claim for deduction on the purchase of motor vehicles, as it did not qualify for benefits under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 10:55:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1207 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191986</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2005-06. The Tribunal upheld the denial of the claim for deduction based on legal principles, following the decision in the case of Reliance Petro Products. The penalty was not imposed due to the denial of the claim for deduction on the purchase of motor vehicles, as it did not qualify for benefits under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>