<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 337 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342599</link>
    <description>Orders passed under the West Bengal Tikha Tenancy (Acquisition and Regulation) Act, 2001 fall within the jurisdiction of the West Bengal Land Reforms and Tenancy Tribunal under the governing tribunal statute. Where Sections 7 and 8 of that statute exclude Single Bench writ jurisdiction, a writ petition under Article 226 challenging such an order is not maintainable before a Single Bench, even if violation of natural justice is alleged. The ordinary principle that natural justice may justify writ intervention despite an alternate remedy does not override an express statutory bar when the dispute lies within the Tribunal&#039;s domain.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 08:25:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 337 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342599</link>
      <description>Orders passed under the West Bengal Tikha Tenancy (Acquisition and Regulation) Act, 2001 fall within the jurisdiction of the West Bengal Land Reforms and Tenancy Tribunal under the governing tribunal statute. Where Sections 7 and 8 of that statute exclude Single Bench writ jurisdiction, a writ petition under Article 226 challenging such an order is not maintainable before a Single Bench, even if violation of natural justice is alleged. The ordinary principle that natural justice may justify writ intervention despite an alternate remedy does not override an express statutory bar when the dispute lies within the Tribunal&#039;s domain.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>