https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342598 The Court held that the Customs & Central Excise Settlement Commission lacked jurisdiction to entertain a review application after rejecting a previous attempt, emphasizing adherence to legal procedures. It ruled against permitting multiple applications seeking the same relief, stressing the importance of exhausting available remedies and respecting finality in legal proceedings. Parties aggrieved by Commission orders were advised to pursue legal recourse through avenues like writ petitions before the High Court. The Court nullified proceedings stemming from a subsequent application, underscoring the significance of upholding legal principles and fair proceedings. en-us Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Nov 2017 12:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342598 The Court held that the Customs & Central Excise Settlement Commission lacked jurisdiction to entertain a review application after rejecting a previous attempt, emphasizing adherence to legal procedures. It ruled against permitting multiple applications seeking the same relief, stressing the importance of exhausting available remedies and respecting finality in legal proceedings. Parties aggrieved by Commission orders were advised to pursue legal recourse through avenues like writ petitions before the High Court. The Court nullified proceedings stemming from a subsequent application, underscoring the significance of upholding legal principles and fair proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342598