https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342596 The appeals dismissed earlier due to non-supply of documents were restored for disposal. The appellant sought discharge of 25% penalty under Section 11AC of CEA, 1944, which was accepted. Penalties on employees were reduced, while those on the director and transporter were upheld due to their significant roles in the goods' removal. The decision by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad considered individual involvement and responsibilities, resulting in partly allowing appeals with reduced penalties for employees and the company. en-us Tue, 02 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 May 2017 14:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342596 The appeals dismissed earlier due to non-supply of documents were restored for disposal. The appellant sought discharge of 25% penalty under Section 11AC of CEA, 1944, which was accepted. Penalties on employees were reduced, while those on the director and transporter were upheld due to their significant roles in the goods' removal. The decision by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad considered individual involvement and responsibilities, resulting in partly allowing appeals with reduced penalties for employees and the company. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 02 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342596