<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 297 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342559</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the disallowance of software expenses as capital expenditure, finding the expenses to result in an enduring benefit. Additionally, the ITAT allowed the deduction under section 80IA based on a judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Gujarat High Court, permitting computation at the selling price. General issues concerning interest and penalty proceedings were not separately addressed, as they were of a general nature and did not require adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 297 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342559</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the disallowance of software expenses as capital expenditure, finding the expenses to result in an enduring benefit. Additionally, the ITAT allowed the deduction under section 80IA based on a judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Gujarat High Court, permitting computation at the selling price. General issues concerning interest and penalty proceedings were not separately addressed, as they were of a general nature and did not require adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>