<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 292 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342554</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to refer the valuation issue to the Departmental Valuation Officer and reassess the case accordingly. The reopening of the assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act was upheld as valid, while the levy of interest under Sections 234B and 234C was dismissed as infructuous pending reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 08:22:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 292 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342554</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to refer the valuation issue to the Departmental Valuation Officer and reassess the case accordingly. The reopening of the assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act was upheld as valid, while the levy of interest under Sections 234B and 234C was dismissed as infructuous pending reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>