<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 288 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342550</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 78, upholding the service tax liability and interest paid by the appellant. The decision was based on the established nature of the contracts as &#039;works contract&#039; and the inapplicability of penalties as per legal interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 May 2017 10:53:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 288 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342550</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 78, upholding the service tax liability and interest paid by the appellant. The decision was based on the established nature of the contracts as &#039;works contract&#039; and the inapplicability of penalties as per legal interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>