<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 279 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342541</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the Order in-Appeal and confirming the appellants&#039; eligibility to avail CENVAT credit of the service tax paid on GTA service against GAR-7 challan. The decision was based on the interpretation of Rule 9(1)(e) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, and previous judgments, emphasizing that the appellants correctly availed the credit in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 May 2017 10:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 279 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342541</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the Order in-Appeal and confirming the appellants&#039; eligibility to avail CENVAT credit of the service tax paid on GTA service against GAR-7 challan. The decision was based on the interpretation of Rule 9(1)(e) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, and previous judgments, emphasizing that the appellants correctly availed the credit in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>