https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342536 The Tribunal allowed the appeal partly, ruling in favor of the appellant on the admissibility of cenvat credit for a photocopy of the courier bill of entry. However, the demand for inadmissible credits on doors and panels used in the office was upheld. The penalty under Section 11AC was deemed not imposable due to the appellant's prompt corrective actions. Consequently, the penalty imposed by the lower authority was set aside. en-us Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 May 2017 10:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342536 The Tribunal allowed the appeal partly, ruling in favor of the appellant on the admissibility of cenvat credit for a photocopy of the courier bill of entry. However, the demand for inadmissible credits on doors and panels used in the office was upheld. The penalty under Section 11AC was deemed not imposable due to the appellant's prompt corrective actions. Consequently, the penalty imposed by the lower authority was set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342536